Wealth inequality
Taxation
Income inequality
2012-2016: University of St. Gallen, PhD in Economics, DIA Programme
2015-2016: University of California, Berkeley, Visiting Student Researcher
2009-2011: University of Bern, MSc in Economics
2005-2009: University of Bern, B.A. in Economics, Minor: Political Science
2007-2008: Free University Berlin, one-year Erasmus Exchange
since April 2020: Post-Doctoral Researcher, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zürich
since Jan. 2018: Member Swiss Competition Commission WEKO
2017-2020: Economist, Swiss Federation of Trade Unions SGB (part-time)
2017-2020: Post-Doctoral Researcher / Project Manager, SIAW-HSG, University of St. Gallen (part-time)
2016-2017: Luxembourg Institute for Socio-Economic Research LISER, Post-Doctoral Researcher
2012-2016: Research Assistant / PhD Candidate, SIAW-HSG, University of St. Gallen
2009-2011: Research Assistant, Swiss Federation of Trade Unions (SGB-USS), Bern
The Influence of Taxation on Wealth and Income Inequality
Abstract
The rapid change of inequality in incomes and wealth in the
world has led to a surge of scientific interest in the topic. Along with
top income shares, top wealth shares have been increasing since the
1980s, especially in the U.S. (Kopczuk and Saez, 2004) but also in
European countries. While there is a mature empirical literature on
(top) income inequality, the knowledge on both the dynamics of (top)
wealth inequality and the economic forces driving them, is still
limited.Analyzing the case of Switzerland, we want first to understand
how top wealth shares evolved on a regional level (Work Package 1).
Second, we analyze wealth mobility and the joint distribution of income
and wealth. To understand the differences in living standards, it is
central to know whether high income earners also control a large part of
private wealth (Work Package 2). Using historical data we are able to
extend the analysis back to the 1940s and uncover
changes over time. This descriptive part of the study is a contribution
to the literature on wealth concentration and mobility at the top in
itself, and it documents the large variation we observe today across
cantons.
Work Package 3 then assesses, theoretically and empirically,
the influence of taxes on wealth concentration, using cantonal
variation. To put the evolution wealth accumulation into broader
context, the last Work Package 4 then looks at the wealth-income ratio
in Switzerland, following the recent strand in the literature on the
distribution of income and wealth that has started to estimate aggregate
wealth-to-income ratios in a consistent manner across countries and
over time, including Piketty (2014) and Piketty and Zucman (2014).
Why
do we analyze Switzerland? First of all, the Swiss case is of great
interest because it is a major industrialized country with a large
financial sector, which also plays a major role in the tax sheltering of
large fortunes (Zucman, 2013). Tax competition within Switzerland and
the absence of wars have kept taxes on income and wealth low and have
not foreclosed possible wealth accumulation. In addition, both large
amounts of foreign assets are deposited in Switzerland, and net foreign
assets of Swiss residents are very large, due to ongoing current account
surpluses. Second, Switzerland is an ideal laboratory to draw empirical
inference. 26 cantons have different tax rates but otherwise comparable
conditions, making it the ideal setting to study outcomes at the
macro-level with panel-econometrics methods.The majority of earlier
studies have to rely on survey data, since not many countries have a
comprehensive wealth tax. Instead, our project makes use of tax data,
which cover a large part of the population, which allows to give a much
more comprehensive understanding of wealth inequality and mobility.
Building on an established working experience with tax data and sharing
our results with leading researchers in the field, we are confident to
achieve the aims of our study.
Personal website: www.isabelzmartinez.com