Opinions - 29.12.2014 - 00:00
22 December 2014. In the newsrooms of the Swiss print media, people seem to be in agreement for once. If we believe the media echo following the national parliament’s autumn session, Switzerland’s energy policy is on the wrong track. "A serious strategy would look different", "National parliament opens the tap for subsidies", "Energy turnaround plunges power supply into chaos" – these are the headlines across a variety of national newspapers. What happened in the country’s capital in those Advent Days? Has parliament decided to break up the big banks? To abolish voting right for men? To nationalise the country’s flagship liberal newspaper, Neue Zürcher Zeitung?
None of the above.The representatives of the people did what they were elected for: they tried to find political majorities for balanced solutions in a complex area that is of enormous importance for Switzerland’s future. It need not exactly be celebrated as the finest hour of parliamentary democracy, and asking critical questions about political decisions is the quintessential function of independent media. We should recall, however, what the actual reasons behind the Energy Strategy 2050 are.
Reducing energy and climate risks
Firstly, like many other European countries, Switzerland’s energy supply is greatly dependent on foreign countries. Non-renewable sources of energy such as oil and uranium, which cover more than three quarters of the country’s energy consumption, must be imported from world regions which in the past year have once again proved to be political powder kegs. With regard to energy, the foreign trade balance reports a gaping deficit of 10 billion francs a year; fossil fuel imports neutralise about half of the exports of the internationally successful Swiss watch industry. Secondly, there is increasing evidence of climate change. 2014 marks the warmest year on record, and extreme weather events have cost lives in Ticino, Switzerland’s Southern region. Yet international climate policy did not manage to get beyond a "too little, too late" again at the latest UN summit in Lima.
A third factor are nuclear risks: the three Swiss reactors Beznau 1+2 and Mühleberg score the first, fourth and sixth places in the ranking of the oldest nuclear power plants still in operation in the world – an anachronism in a country which in many ways can claim to be at the leading edge of technology. The construction of new nuclear power plants cannot find a majority among Swiss people, and where this is aimed at – as in the UK – it is based on government guarantees which eclipse German solar power funding.
Against this background, the thrust of the energy strategy, namely a gradual shift from non-renewable to renewable energies with a simultaneous emphasis on energy efficiency, is a logical consequence and is backed by large parts of the population. Thousands of projects for power generation from renewable energies, and trail-blazing initiatives of municipalities and regions show that Swiss people are ready to walk the talk. Why, then, the bad press?
The sceptics’ three main points
In my view, the criticism expressed by the Energiewende sceptics focuses on three essential aspects, which can be encapsulated in the terms "Illusion", "subsidies" and "chaos". The reproach that the objectives of the energy strategy are illusory is aimed at the Federal Council’s intention of reducing energy consumption, in particular. It is true that a decrease in energy consumption would constitute the turnaround of a trend. Breaks in trends are a challenge for human imagination, but then growth in perpetuity has equally little plausibility. Landline telephony and food consumption have not grown in the last few years, yet we are no worse off than before.
Indeed, the suppliers of diets are enjoying a flourishing demand among health-conscious citizens. When it comes to energy consumption, a fear of government intervention and even of rationing lurks in the background. At the same time, people tend to forget that the consumption of non-renewable energies can also be curbed by personal saturation limits and technological innovations such as highly efficient LED lamps and e-bikes. And: doing nothing does not guarantee that one of these days we will not be confronted with limits imposed by external factors.
The second point at which the criticism is aimed is "subsidies", particularly for the promotion of renewable energies. Feed-in tariffs has become the red rag for energy turnaround sceptics. This has resulted in remarkable coalitions: liberal politicians, economic modellers and the nuclear lobby unanimously call for "more market orientation" and demand a switch to quota models or energy taxes, which in economic textbooks are praised as "first-best Solutions".
If we ask for where these economic instruments have effectively been implemented in reality, they quickly lose a large part of their textbook elegance. The EU emission trading scheme and its susceptibility to political influence exerted by a few economic sectors provide plenty of illustrative examples. Whether everyone who is now calling for a transition from feed-in tariffs to economic instruments will support the popular initiative for a transition from VAT to energy taxes, which is up for voting next year, remains to be seen. If they do not, the question will arise as to how long we will lament the demise of the two birds in the bush before we can make friends with the bird in our hand.
Thirdly, there is the charge of "chaos", often combined with a pointer to developments in Germany, whose energy transition serves as a projection surface for everything that can go wrong. What is often forgotten in this context, however, is that geographical proximity is also an opportunity to have a constructive and critical look at the challenges and experiences of a country which pursues a similar energy policy approach at a higher speed. An atmosphere of mutual learning is no guarantee for perfect solutions, but with a generational project like Switzerland’s Energy Strategy 2050, doing everything right everywhere from the word go would be tantamount to squaring the circle. Every entrepreneur knows: there is no innovation without taking controlled risk.
A confident outlook
We have the unique opportunity today to lay one of the most important foundations for the economic development of Switzerland in the 21st century. The technological dynamism of the last few years has resulted in a situation whereby the changeover to sun, wind & co. is more affordable for us than for any previous generation. Intelligent grids and low-emission mobility are at the brink of a major breakthrough. Let us use this opportunity to ensure that our children will be able to look at the annual review of 2050 and read the headline "2014 – a milestone on the way towards a climate-friendly and successful Switzerland".
Bild: Photocase / toast198
More articles from the same category
On the night of June 24, 2023, Prigozhin began his march on Moscow, escalating the power struggle between the Wagner Group and Russian military…
Collection of quotes from HSG Professors: how Smith has affected their academic careers and what mistakes or omissions did he make in his view of…
On 18 June 2023, Swiss voters will decide on whether to implement a minimum tax on multi-national corporations. Professor of Public Finance Christian…
Since the beginning of the Russian invasion of Ukraine last year, food security has been a global concern. An opinion piece by HSG Professor Simon J.…
Discover our special topics